I was trying to intelligently respond to this issue, but in reading the comments on the Verge article, I found a rebuttal that is much more concise and well reasoned than anything I could come up with. So here is commenter asarathy’s response:
This attitude is so entitled and naive. Sure, the company should be careful in engaging in out right evil like say identifying which citizens to round up for the Purge, but to act as if there is no place for Google to help in defense of what is their home country is silly. Yes I get they are an international company but they are an American company and there are places where it makes sense to leverage it’s talents for it’s defense.
“Some of our biggest companies have spent almost half their earnings to buy back their own stock, and another third or more to pay dividends. That doesn’t leave a lot left to raise pay or invest in the workers or make new investments to ensure a company’s future success” Clinton said. “These trends need to change.”
via Hillary Clinton Says On-Demand Economy Raises Hard Questions About Workplace Protections | TechCrunch.
And all of them over pay their executives. Is Meg Whitman really worth $20 million? Is she really worth 100 engineers? But that’s peanuts compared to Tim Cook.
“Confederate flag: Why it is so potent in the US” – BBC News
But undeniably it (the Confederate Flag) has also been the rallying banner of an active and successful resistance to racial equality, a celebration of the renaissance of white power, a symbol that the struggle did not end in 1865.
A concise and unerring argument on the Confederate Flag.